[SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- From: Damon Bowser <damonjbowser@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Duane,
So how does one determine if it is magnetic or
capacitive crosstalk that is dominating in a
particular configuration?
Let's say I get two matrices from a field solver that
look like this:
C11 C12
C21 C22
and
L11 L12
L21 L22
Do I just look at how C12/C11 compares to L12/L11 and
how C21/C22 compares to L21/L22 ?
Thanks
Damon
> X-Original-To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Delivered-To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Duane Takahashi
> <duanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0;
> en-US; rv:1.4)
> Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential
> pairs
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-archive-position: 8392
> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
> X-original-sender: duanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-list: si-list
>
> It also depends on the type of crosstalk: electric
> or magnetic (
> capacitive or inductive ). If it's magnetic, guard
> traces won't help.
> If it's capacitive, guards will help but will leave
> you with the
> 'magnetic remainder' of the xtalk.
>
> I've seen high impedance lines, more than 60 ohms,
> exhibit inductive
> xtalk. My guess is guard traces would not have
> helped in this case.
>
> Regards,
> Duane
>
> > Sogo,
> >
> > It is true that guard traces can INCREASE
> crosstalk, but
> > this can be avoided (and crosstalk in fact can be
> REDUCED)
> > if the via stitching is frequent enough. Between
> each
> > stitching, there is a half-wavelength resonator,
> with a
> > lowest resonance frequency of fres=1/(2*tpd),
> where
> > tpd is the propagation delay between two stitching
> vias.
> > As long as the bandwidth of the signal on the
> structure
> > is safely below this resonance frequency, there
> should be no
> > problem with signal integrity.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Istvan Novak
> > SUN Microsystems
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- From: Duane Takahashi
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Re: Guard traces for differential pairs
- From: Duane Takahashi