[SI-LIST] Fw: RE: low loss & smallest size flexible Co-axial Cable
- From: padma gundala <pgundala2001@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, padma gundala <pgundala2001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: padma gundala <pgundala2001@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] low loss & smallest size flexible Co-axial Cable
To: "Tori Meek" <tori.meek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 5:12 PM
Tori,
Â
How does this compare to the .81 cable of samtec attached, in terms of the 3db
loss?
This is what we used earlier to perform signal integrity tests initially.
We use one end of the cable to solder to PCB.
Since it is really small , very flexible connecting to the sma does not
cause solder to break off.
Also the photos of the cable you have suggested looks very wide like a ribbon.
Â
Thanks,
Pam
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Tori Meek <tori.meek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Tori Meek <tori.meek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] low loss & smallest size flexible Co-axial Cable
To: pgundala2001@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 1:48 PM
Pam,
Â
Check out our RF25M series:
http://samtec.com/technical_specifications/overview.aspx?series=rf25m .
 Itâ??s a low loss cable that has an outside diameter of 1.9mm compared to the
RG316 diameter of 2.53mm. Â We offer both the SMA plug and bulkhead jack as
terminations.
Â
If you think this will work, configure a part number from the prints at the
above link and I can get you some samples.
Â
Thanks,
Tori Meek
Samtec Inc
Signal Integrity Group
Â
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of pgundala2001@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:38 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] low loss & smallest size flexible Co-axial Cable
Â
Hi ,
Â
Can any recommend a co-axial cable that has low losses like the RG 316\(100
ohms diff. impedance)Â , yet the size of overall dia. needs to be min. (very
flexible) with sma connector connected.
Samtec's MH081 cable with sma connector is good except the attenuation db/m is
almost double of the RG316.
Â
Thanks,
Â
Pam
Â
Â
Â
    Â
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
Â
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
Â
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
Â
Â
List technical documents are available at:
               http://www.si-list.net
Â
List archives are viewable at:Â Â Â Â
           http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
           http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
           http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Â
Â
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: