[SI-LIST] Re: Diff line

  • From: Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: benrothchild@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:29:06 -0800

Ben,

Here are the answers to your questions.

>How is impedance control dependent on whether
>they are loosely/tightly coupled.
>
With loosely coupled differential pairs, manufacturing etch contol 
affects the width of the traces, which alters the impedance.  For 
tightly coupled differential pairs, the width between the pairs is also 
greatly altered by the etch dimensions.  Impedance of a differential 
pair trace is controled by the width of the trace and the separation of 
the edges.  The percentage change for both is higher with a tightly 
coupled differential pair.

>What is even mode return loss and how is coupling
>affecting this.
>
Even mode return loss is S11 for the common mode signal (the part of the 
signal that is not differential and is caused by driver and delay skew) 
and is the reflected energy that returns back to the driver.  Higher 
return loss means more common mode energy is bouncing around.   This is 
usually due to impedance mismatch in the system.  Tighter trace coupling 
causes a larger divergence in odd and even mode impedances.  If the 
system is matched for odd mode (differential transmission) then the even 
mode suffers greater mismatch and return loss.  This can become a 
problem when the even mode return loss sets up unwanted resonance 
conditions in the system.

>How is insertion loss affected by coupling.
>
To achieve the same differential impedances, conductor width must be 
smaller for tightly coupled differential pairs, when compared to loosely 
coupled differential pairs.  This smaller width causes higher DC 
conductor loss and higher AC losses at high frequencies due to skin 
effect.  In addition, a larger percentage of the fields for tightly 
coupled differential pairs are concentrated towards the edge of the 
pair, increasing the field concentration here and thereby increasing the 
conductor losses.

>Are you experts there driving gigabit links
>through 2mm open pin field connectors!
>Its very hard to believe. Or is it controlled
>impedance connectors. But then are there any
>controlled impedance 2mm connectors. Any 
>inputs on what connectors you are using and
>the highest data rate.
>
Teradyne, Molex, Tyco, FCI, Erni and many others make a number of 
varieties of 2 mm connectors which have controlled impedance for 50 ohm 
single-ended and 100 ohm differential signals.  We've used them 
successfully for 2.5 and 3.125 Gbps system backplanes.  Some of the 
newer connectors are capable of supporting nearly 10 Gbps data transmission.

>How is impedance variation at connector, BGA
>escapes and via transitions affected by 
>coupling.
>
Tightly coupled differenential pair separation must be widened at the 
point of insertion into these strucures.  Changing the separation of the 
pairs causes a change in impedance.

>What resonance are you refering to, could you
>please elaborate.
>
Whenever an impedance mismatch occurs a resonance structure is formed. 
 Quarter-wave and half-wave resonance structures are created by these 
mismatches.  These resonance modes can cause degradation in signal 
waveshape and can couple to other similar resonance structures across 
the board.  I'd refer you to the book: Microwave Engineering by Pozar 
for more information on resonance.


Good questions, Ben.



regards,

scott

-- 
Scott McMorrow
Principal Engineer
SiQual Interconnect Engineering
18735 SW Boones Ferry Road
Tualatin, OR  97062-3090
(503) 885-1231
http://www.siqual.com



------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: