[SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: "Martin Euredjian" <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:31:10 -0800
From: Philip Ross Wellington
> Some provided Pi filters for the
> ground but that didn't work well logically because of the return path
> inductance and Signal Integrity (not even coined back then) induced
> problems.
On datasheets I've seen recommended isolation/filtering networks that look
like this:
(values chosen at random)
RAW_VCC -----------BEAD-------------- VCC'
| | | |
| | | |
22uF 0.1uF 0.1uF 22uF
| | | |
| | | |
RAW_GND -----------BEAD-------------- GND'
versus:
RAW_VCC -----------BEAD-------------- VCC'
| | | |
| | | |
22uF 0.1uF 0.1uF 22uF
| | | |
| | | |
RAW_GND ----------------------------- GND'
Is there any merit to the first approach, say, for a clock, or a device with
a PLL, or a sensitive analog sub-section? Both in terms of circuit
operation and EMI/RFI concerns.
I've also seen a couple where the beads are replaced with low or 0 ohm
resistors.
Thanks,
===============================
Martin Euredjian
eCinema Systems, Inc.
voice: 661-305-9320
fax: 661-775-4876
martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.ecinemasys.com
===============================
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: David Lieby
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: Brent DeWitt
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: pwelling
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: David Lieby
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: Brent DeWitt
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling of Oscillator
- From: pwelling