[SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: zhangkun 29902 <zhang_kun@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:24 +0800
Andy
I use spectrum analyzer to measure the power ground noise in frequency domain.
At almost all the harmonic frequency, the amplitude with 0 ohm resistor is less
of 3db than that with bead.
The pre-filter power is of plane pair.
Best Regards
Zhangkun
2004.8.29
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Ingraham <a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, August 28, 2004 9:48 pm
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
> Zhangkun,
>
> Some PLLs can be very sensitive to tiny amounts of noise. They
> are, after
> all, analog devices.
>
> When you say the noise difference is only 3dB, (1) that might be
> just enough
> of a difference to cause a problem, if your circuits were just on
> the edge
> of misbehaving; and (2) if you are measuring and comparing
> broadband noise,
> it is a meaningless comparison. The PLL is particularly sensitive
> to noise
> at particular frequencies, and you may need to look specifically
> for those
> frequencies. A broadband noise measurement could mask the
> frequencies that
> are causing the problem. Even a spectrum analyzer might, if you
> don't know
> what frequencies to look for.
>
> Another thought: does connecting the instruments to measure the noise,
> significantly affect the circuit? Maybe simply connecting probes
> reducesthe noise enough to stop that PLL from misbehaving (while
> the other two PLLs
> continue to misbehave).
>
> How clean is the pre-filtered power? Is it a plane?
>
> Is there anything else of an analog nature on this board?
>
> Regards,
> Andy
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: Istvan NOVAK
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: Istvan NOVAK