[SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: "Andrew Ingraham" <a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 09:58:15 -0400
Mike,
> The 3db point
> is
> Around 10Khz.
...
> I also simulated with a Tant. Cap instead of cer cap ...
> The draw back is the 3db point now at 100Kz.
What were the values of your ceramic and tantalum caps?
If must be either a small tantalum cap, or a large ceramic, for the filter's
cutoff frequency to have gone UP that much with the tantalum.
> If the peak
> happens at a non-existing frequency, why do I care?
If the peak isn't severe, maybe you don't. However, in many circuits,
chances are that sooner or later, something like a data pattern may come
along that excites that resonance, and causes problems. In any event, a
high-Q peak is just plain trouble. Off-frequency transients would cause
it to ring.
Regards,
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: Nguyen, Mike
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- [SI-LIST] Re: Decoupling for PLL
- From: Nguyen, Mike