Well, actually it depends on the boards stack-up.=20 If your VCC plane is coupled to GND plane with thin dielectric - around 2 mils, the noise on that plane is very hard to distinguish from the noise on the adjacent GND plane. Regards,=20 Dagmara Avanindra On 7/18/05, Grasso, Charles <Charles.Grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Be very careful with the decoupler to Vcc. You *will* > couple power noise onto Vref that only has a 50mV limit. >=20 > Best Regards > Charles Grasso > Senior Compliance Engineer > Echostar Communications Corp. > Tel: 303-706-5467 > Fax: 303-799-6222 > Cell: 303-204-2974 > Pager/Short Message: 3032042974@xxxxxxxx > Email: charles.grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > Email Alternate: chasgrasso@xxxxxxxx >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = On > Behalf Of Tom Dagostino > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:38 PM > To: Dale L. Sanders; crjohnson11@xxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: DDR Vref Bypassing >=20 >=20 > Dale >=20 > I read the initial post as saying connect a capacitor from Vref to ground > and another capacitor from Vref to Vcc. Your circuit, if I understand it > correctly, is to connect one half of your X2Y cap from Vref to ground and > the other half from Vcc to ground. This is not apples apples but apples = and > oranges I believe. >=20 > Tom Dagostino > Teraspeed(R) Labs > 13610 SW Harness Lane > Beaverton, OR 97008 > 503-430-1065 > tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > www.teraspeed.com >=20 > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > 121 North River Drive > Narragansett, RI 02882 > 401-284-1827 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale L. Sanders [mailto:Dale@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 11:47 AM > To: tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; crjohnson11@xxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: DDR Vref Bypassing >=20 >=20 > Tom, > I agree that standard capacitors that could be an issue of coupling noise > between VDD and Vref. >=20 > But if balance is critical, X2Y can be attached in a "Circuit 1" > configuration ... where "A" terminal is attached to VDD and 'B' terminal = is > attached to Vref and 'G1' and 'G2' are attached to GND. X2Y would only ha= ve > minimal noise coupling between VDD and Vref. >=20 > To illustrate this, you can see the data presented at the Freescale > Technology Forum Workshop last month (June) in Orlando, FL (pages 49 - 52= ). >=20 > http://www.x2y.com/x2y/x2y.nsf/1/ftfdecouple.pdf/$FILE/ftfdecouple.pdf >=20 >=20 >=20 > Dale L. Sanders > Application Engineer > X2Y Attenuators, LLC >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = On > Behalf Of Tom Dagostino > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:16 PM > To: crjohnson11@xxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: DDR Vref Bypassing >=20 > Using capacitors to both ground and Vcc seems to be an invitation to > disaster. The idea of putting a cap to a reference voltage is to keep the= AC > impedance low and reference voltage referenced to ground (usually). Most > supplies have a lot of noise on them when measured to ground. Adding a c= ap > from the supply to the reference voltage will inject this unwanted noise > into Vref. If your circuit is set up such that its reference is Vcc then= a > cap to Vcc would be good and a cap to ground would inject noise. >=20 > Tom Dagostino > Teraspeed(R) Labs > 13610 SW Harness Lane > Beaverton, OR 97008 > 503-430-1065 > tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > www.teraspeed.com >=20 > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > 121 North River Drive > Narragansett, RI 02882 > 401-284-1827 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]O= n > Behalf Of Christopher R. Johnson > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 10:49 AM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] DDR Vref Bypassing >=20 >=20 > I have seen references that have Vref bypass capacitors to both VDD and > GND. Other references have capacitors only to GND. Is it really > necessary to have "balanced" capacitors on the Vref lines? Why? If the > "balanced" design is desirable, would an X2Y capacitor be a good choice, > since it is "2 capacitors in one"? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Chris Johnson > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu