[SI-LIST] Re: Current Return Path
- From: "Abhijit Mahajan" <amahajan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kfrobinson@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:04:49 -0700
This is very interesting. I wish all the rules of thumb and common
knowledge could be supported by/put to the test with such experiments.
My ideas on this one:
I am assuming that vterm is the exact same supply as vdd of the driver.
1. Removal of the bypass caps will make the return path impedance
higher. The effect of this may be visible more as increased power suppy
noise due to switching of several signals. This noise can also couple
on to victim nets.
2. Thus, I think looking at vterm is also important. The variation in
vterm should be higher after removal of caps.
3. Finally, depending on the edge rates, on-die bypassing may have been
sufficient. (I am not sure.)
Abhijit.
kfrobinson@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> All,
> I was recently evaluating a board design and noticed that some signals =
> were referenced to a power plane(VTERM) and some nets were referenced to =
> ground. This is a very large board 13" x 22" and there are bypass caps =
> between the power plane and ground plane around the perimeter of the =
> board. I thought I would see if I could destroy the current return path =
> by removing all the bypass caps between the power plane and ground plane =
> except from the far end of the board furthest from the driver. I then =
> looked at the signals that were referenced to the power plane and they =
> were identical to what they had been before the removal of caps. I =
> took scope shots at multiple locations before and after the cap removal. =
> The net in question runs the length(22") of the board right down the =
> center. I had expected to see a pronounced change, but did not see one. =
> Any thoughts?
>
> Stack up
> s
> vterm
> s
> s
> vcc
> gnd
> vcc
> gnd
> s
> s
> gnd
> s
>
> Ken Robinson
> kfrobinson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Current Return Path
- From: kfrobinson
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Current Return Path
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Current Return Path
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Current Return Path
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Current Return Path
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Current Return Path
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Current Return Path
- [SI-LIST] Current Return Path
- From: kfrobinson