[SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: "Andrew W. Riley III" <drew3rdof3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "SI LIST" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:37:43 -0700
Stuart,
I do not see board warpage being a factor unless there are extreme
differences in copper layers of the PCB, or the fab house is not reputable.
Coming from the layout side, I have only had complaints from fab houses WRT
tolerances and extended reliability at 2oz routing layers. At that time it
was the customer's request and I was able to talk them down with facts
supplied or easily researched and sometimes a conference call that included
an engineer specialized in signal integrity with reliable simulation tools.
In an attempt to make this reply short, my experience has been that
increasing copper weight was not a favorable consideration in those designs.
Having the backup of an experienced and proven signal integrity expert on
call was a factor.
Sometimes you gotta bite the bullet and let the powers that be know it's not
gonna be free.
Cheers!
Drew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Brorson" <sdb@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Dagmara Avanindra" <dagmara.avanindra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "SI LIST" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:22 PM
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
> Dagmara,
>
>> I would advise staying away from 2 oz copper thickness, espeacially if
>> this
>> is a large board.
>> I have seen alot of reliability issues related to such a thick metal.
>
> I would be interested to hear in more detail about what type of
> reliability issues you have seen. Is it board warpage?
>
> Stuart
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: Stuart Brorson
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Cu Thickness
- From: sunil bharadwaz
- [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: Dagmara Avanindra
- [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: Stuart Brorson
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: Stuart Brorson
- [SI-LIST] Cu Thickness
- From: sunil bharadwaz
- [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: Dagmara Avanindra
- [SI-LIST] Re: Cu Thickness
- From: Stuart Brorson