Hi Jack, According to public opened document; Intel(R) Pentium(R)4 Processor in 478-pin Package and Intel(R) 845 Chipset Platform for DDR Design Guide (Feb. 2002, Doc#29805-002) Section 5.3.1.2.2 "Strobe to Clock Length Matching Requirements", Constraints what you said between CK and DQS are described as followings; - SCK/SCK# Length = X - SDQS Length = Y, where (X - 2.0") <= Y <= (X - 1.0") It is not so curious, isn't it? Regards, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:54:42 +0800 "Jack W.C. Lin" <JackWCLin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi John: > Thanks for your reply. But I think it is too dangerous for such = > constraint > like Intel, say X-4.4<=3DY. This is a lower bound constraint for DQ/DQS = > or > upper bound constraint for CK/CK#. We all know that it is impossible to > implement another delay mechanism in the DDR memory cell, for more = > accurate > data latched by internal device in the cell, it should put a constraint = > like > X-4.4<=3DY<=3Dsome value, that will more make sure that data arrived = > later than > clock for internal device in the memory cell, isn't it?=20 > > > Jack > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Phillips [mailto:John.Phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20 > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:05 PM > To: Jack W.C. Lin; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Constraints on DQ/DQS and CK/CK# in DDR > > > Once DQS latches the DQ at the input to the part, the device must then > synchronise the data to its local clock. If the clocks between say the = > NB > and the DDR memory devices are to far out of alignment, it will not be > possibble to compensate for this mis-alignment in the recieving device. = > This > will mean that the data cannot be properly sampled in the local devices > recieving clock domain. > > Best Regards > > John > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20 > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jack W.C. Lin > > Sent: 17 October 2002 09:32 > > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Constraints on DQ/DQS and CK/CK# in DDR > > > > > > Hi All SI friends: > > I met a question about DDR. We all know that DDR is a source=20 > > synchronus structure, data transfer will not depend on bus clock any > > more. In chip > > design, there exist Delay mechanism for DQ and DQS (90 degree > > phase shift) > > which is controlled by bus clock. But we found that either in > > Intel 845 chip > > series or AMD K8 =A1K., they all have some layout constraint on > > DQ/DQS and > > command clock (CK&CK#). For example in Intel, if DQ/DQS > > length is Y, CK/CK# > > is X, then they should follow X-4.4<=3DY. In AMD, Y=3DX+0.5 or > > Y=3DX-0.5. Why? In > > DDR mechanism, it seems no reason to put such constraints on > > them. Maybe I > > miss something, is there anyone could provide a reasonable > > explanation? > > Thanks > > > > Jack > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:=20 > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Virus checked by MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Virus checked by MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > //// /// // / / / / / / / / / / Tadashi Arai//Platform Design Dept.,Mobile Computing Div. Fujitsu Limited arap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx TEL:+81-42-370-7624 Ohmaru, Inagi-shi, Tokyo, Japan / / / / / / / / / / / // //// ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu