[SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors arrays. worth it or not?

  • From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Larry Smith" <LSMITH@xxxxxxxxxx>,"Hill, John" <jhill@xxxxxxxxxx>, <Mark.Randol@xxxxxxxxxx>,"si-list" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:10:25 -0700

Larry, I am familiar with the excellent models that you have 
developed as well as Istvan's papers.  We have some cool CST 
simulations on this.  For most of the caps that I play with I have 
found that a three branch model correlates measured common geometry 
mounts within a half dB from DC out to a couple of GHz.  The number 
of branches needed depends on just how close the cap gets to the planes.

Best Regards,


Steve.
At 09:46 AM 5/23/2006, Larry Smith wrote:
>Steve, John - here is another interesting way to look at it.  When a
>ceramic capacitor is mounted such that the capacitor plates are parallel
>to the PCB plates, the capacitor forms a vertical transmission line with
>inductance per unit length and capacitance per unit length.  The far end
>of the transmission line is open circuit (air) and the near end is
>nearly shorted (PCB power planes present a very low impedance to the
>mounted capacitor).  This makes a quarter wavelength resonator similar
>to a 50 Ohm transmission line that is open on one end.  At the quarter
>wavelength frequency, the open circuit at the far end becomes a low
>impedance node at the near end.  This is the series resonant frequency
>of the capacitor.  The peaks and dips that you might see beyond the
>series resonance of the capacitor are associated with the half, 3/4,
>full,  1 1/4, etc, wavelengths of the capacitor transmission line.
>
>To see this effect, you must mount the capacitor on vias and pads that
>have less inductance than the capacitor itself otherwise the resonance
>is completely dominated by the mounting inductance.  Tall capacitors
>with very low ESR show this effect the best.  I was evaluating a bunch
>of capacitors one time and the 33nF NPO 2220 size capacitor strongly
>exhibited these properties.  It is very tall and has low ESR because of
>the many, many plates.  I had it mounted on a fixture estimated at 83pH
>but the inductance associated with the capacitor itself was about 1 nH.
>There were perhaps a half a dozen dips and peaks beyond series resonance
>associated with the transmission line properties of the capacitor.
>
>David Hockanson and I did a couple of papers on this at 2002 and 2003
>ECTC conference and another one at 2005 Design Con.  You can actually
>use the transmission line properties of a capacitor to develop a ladder
>SPICE model and extract the element values.  The model accurately
>predicts the reduction of inductance and the increase in ESR of a
>capacitor mounted on low inductance pads.  This is important to simulate
>the parallel resonance that may occur between two capacitors or between
>a capacitor and power planes.  Ceramic capacitors have a lot more ESR
>and less ESL than might be expected from a simple RLC model beyond
>series resonance.
>
>Mounting capacitors with the plates perpendicular to the PCB planes
>(rather than parallel) eliminates or at least greatly changes this
>mechanism.  As Istvan mentioned, the resonances are very much reduced.
>I believe that there is still an increase in ESR and a reduction of ESL
>beyond series resonance as the current does not want to get very far
>away from the PCB power planes (big inductive loop).  Once again, you
>would have to mount the capacitors on very low inductance mounts in
>order to see this.
>
>Regards,
>Larry Smith
>Altera Corporation
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of steve weir
>Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 11:27 PM
>To: Hill, John; Mark.Randol@xxxxxxxxxx; si-list
>Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors arrays. worth it or not?
>
>John, you've got it.  The vertical orientation makes for N very small
>cavities all acting in parallell.  Hence, the secondary resonance
>occurs at a much higher frequency.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>Steve.
>At 01:50 PM 5/22/2006, Hill, John wrote:
> >Steve,
> >
> >I'm sorry to be a little thick on this issue, but I may be getting the
> >two orientations confused. If I understand you correctly, the following
> >is true:
> >
> >It is Edie currents that keep the current concentrated in the lower
> >plates of a capacitor when the capacitor is mounted horizontally, which
> >we are defining as having the plates parallel to the board. This
>creates
> >a resonate cavity under the part.
> >
> >When the capacitor is mounted with the plates perpendicular to the
>board
> >the current flows through all the plates.
> >
> >Is this correct?
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------
> >The information in this email and attachments hereto may contain
> >legally privileged, proprietary or confidential information that is
> >intended for a particular recipient. If you are not the intended
> >recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
> >this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
> >that any disclosure, copying, distribution, retention or use of the
> >contents of this e-mail information is prohibited and may be
> >unlawful. When addressed to Takata customers or vendors, any
> >information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and
> >conditions in the governing contract, if applicable. If you have
> >received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
> >by return e-mail, permanently delete any electronic copies of this
> >communication and destroy any paper copies.
> >---------------------------------------
> >-----Original Message-----
> >
> >From: steve weir [mailto:weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:41 PM
> >To: Hill, John; Mark.Randol@xxxxxxxxxx; si-list
> >Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors arrays. worth it or not?
> >
> >John, when the plates of a cap are parallel to the planes, eddy
> >currents block field penetration to the upper plates through the
> >cavity.  The field still goes around the terminal metalization.  This
> >makes a resonant cavity.
> >
> >Steve.
> >At 10:50 AM 5/22/2006, Hill, John wrote:
> > >Mark,=20
> > >
> > >We have uploaded an application note from American Technical Ceramics
> > >concerning placing capacitors vertical and horizontal. The URL is:
> > >
> > >http://si-list.org/files/tech_files/ATC%20select_cap_wireless.pdf
> > >
> > >I have also sent an e-mail to the application engineer about the
>issue
> > >of eddy currents limiting the field. The data in the application note
> > >does not look like it supports the idea and I do not understand the
> > >physics.=20
> > >
> > >John
> > >
> > >
> > >=20
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------
> > >The information in this email and attachments hereto may contain
> >legally =
> > >privileged, proprietary or confidential information that is intended
> >for =
> > >a particular recipient. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or
> >the =
> > >employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the =
> > >intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, =
> > >copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this
>e-mail
> >=
> > >information is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to
>Takata
> >=
> > >customers or vendors, any information contained in this e-mail is =
> > >subject to the terms and conditions in the governing contract, if =
> > >applicable. If you have received this communication in error, please
>=
> > >immediately notify us by return e-mail, permanently delete any =
> > >electronic copies of this communication and destroy any paper copies.
> > >---------------------------------------
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >
> > >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > >On Behalf Of Mark Randol
> > >Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 10:33 AM
> > >To: si-list
> > >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors arrays. worth it or not?
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=3D20
> > > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Martinson
> > > >=3D20
> > > > I've always wondered how discrete cap performance is affected=3D20
> > > > if the caps plates are parallel with the underlying plane or=3D20
> > > > if they are perpendicular.  I'd think that having them rolled=3D20
> > > > 90 degrees
> > > > (perpendicular) might make them perform better in some=3D20
> > > > regions.  I wonder how this would extend to arrays and=3D20
> > > > whether arrays are configured rolled or not.  Does anyone=3D20
> > > > know? =3D20
> > >
> > >American Technical Ceramics (ATC) used to recommend 'vertical'
> >placement
> > >of their porcelain caps for just this reason.  I've seen it make
> >several
> > >100MHz's of difference in the measured resonance frequency.  That was
> >on
> > >a relatively thick 2 layer PCB, so on a board with a thinner
>component
> > >to ground layer spacing this could be more significant <guess>.  I
> > >didn't find it on their web site, but here is their link.
> > >
> > >http://www.atceramics.com/
> > >
> > >Now how much of this was due to plate coupling to the substrate, or
> > >reduced effective capacitance and inductance because of current
> >crowding
> > >towards the new 'bottom' of all the plates, beats me.  It seems to me
> >in
> > >the horizontal orientation, the upper plates would have slightly more
> > >inductance due to the greater loop area.  Which effect dominates,
> > >capacitance or inductance? =3D20
> > >
> > >The problem at the time was fixed, so we didn't investigate further.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Mark Randol, RF Evaluation & Application Engineer
> > >Not speaking for my company, etc
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > >
> > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > >For help:
> > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > >List technical documents are available at:
> > >                 http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > >List archives are viewable at:    =20
> > >                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > >or at our remote archives:
> > >                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > >                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > >
> > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > >For help:
> > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > >List technical documents are available at:
> > >                 http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > >List archives are viewable at:
> > >                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > >or at our remote archives:
> > >                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > >                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: