Daniel, The book I promised is finally in print! It is titled "Right the First Time, A Practical Handbook on High Speed PCB and System Design". You can preview it and order it on my web site www.speedingedge.com. Hope you like it. Lee > [Original Message] > From: Paradis, Daniel <Daniel.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paradis, Daniel <Daniel.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 7/30/2003 10:33:02 AM > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors and Anti-resonance > > Lee > Thanks for your feedback. > I will try to get the paper. > Do you have the URL ? > Who will be the publisher of your book? > I am always interested by the latest. > > Regards > DP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Ritchey [mailto:leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:07 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paradis, Daniel > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors and Anti-resonance > > > Daniel, > > There is a much better paper on this done by the engineers at University of > Missouri Rolla. It demonstrates that the location of capacitors of any > value makes little or no difference at the frequencies involved in edges of > that speed. Their self inductance renders them ineffective. The plane > capacitor you intentionally build into the PCB is the supplier of those > switching currents. > > I have repeated those tests with a fellow engineer and demonstrated the > same thing. Our results will be published in my new book, "Right the First > Time, a Practical Handbook on High Speed Design'. > > The UMR paper is: Hubing, Todd H. etal, "Power Bus Decoupling on > Multilayer Printed Circuit Boards" IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic > Compatibility, Vol. 37, NO 2, May 1995. > > Lee > > > > Lee Ritchey > leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Why Wait? Move to EarthLink. > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Paradis, Daniel <Daniel.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: 7/29/2003 4:55:42 PM > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors and Anti-resonance > > > > Well I did my homework > > in "High-Speed Digital Design" by H. Johnson & M. Graham. (12th printing) > > It is said p. 260... > > " a rising edge of 1ns propagating in FR-4 material has a length of about > l= > > 6 in. > > No benefit will be derived in this example from a capacitor grid spaced > > further apart than l/12 = 0.5 inch" > > > > Now if I follow the same logic... > > for a 1 ns system I can use different values of caps for every sections > > if > > they are spaced apart by more than 0.5inch > > without risking any antiresonance effect. > > > > Does it make sense? > > Anybody? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paradis, Daniel > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:58 AM > > > To: 'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > > > Subject: Capacitors and Anti-resonance > > > > > > I started to use only 0.1uF decoupling caps on our latest designs. > > > This is to avoid the anti-resonance effect that occurs when using 2 > > > different caps near each other. > > > The rule of thumb is to use the largest cap available for the package. > > > > > > So far I got good results, but I was wondering.... > > > > > > Is-there a simple way to determine the distance between 2 different > > > decoupling caps beyond which there is no anti-resonance effect? > > > > > > In other words.. > > > Say that I stick to this general rule of using only one cap. > > > It seems to me that there could be exceptions to that rule. > > > In the case of a high speed clock buffer for instance; > > > I could need 0.0047uF instead of 0.1uF > > > If this clock buffer is located far from other parts of the design. > > > Can I avoid anti-resonance? > > > > > > > > > Daniel Paradis > > > Staff Electrical Engineer > > > Digital Subscriber Networks > > > > > > Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. > > > 5030 Sugarloaf Parkway, ATL 1.3468 > > > Lawrenceville, GA 30042 > > > Tel: (770) 236-7896 > > > Fax: (770) 236-2449 > > > > > > > > > > > > - - - - - - - Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. - - - - - - - > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is > confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The > information is solely intended for the named addressee (or a person > responsible for delivering it to the addressee). If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to read, print, > retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have > received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by > return e-mail and delete it from your computer. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu