If PDN design could be adequately described in a few paragraphs, people wouldn't have design failures. There are now some decent books dedicated to power distribution: Iorga, Novak, Swaminathan, etc. There are a number of other books that at least dedicate chapters to it: Bogatin, Johnson, Ritchey, etc. These are all worth studying. Steve On 3/11/2012 12:45 AM, Rick Collins wrote: > First, let me say that I am no expert in power distribution system > (PDS) design. I took a class with Lee Ritchey a few years back and > tried to absorb everything he taught in that class, which PDS was a > small part of. There were several points he made which stuck with > me. We'll see how well I remember... > 1) To be effective, the impedance of the PDS has to be adequately low > across the frequency spectrum. Using a single value or type of > capacitance won't give you that in most situations because capacitors > are capacitive below their resonance and the impedance > rises. Capacitors are inductive above their frequency of resonance > and the impedance also rises. Larger values of electrolytic or > tantalum capacitors are used to get low impedance at lower > frequencies. Ceramic caps provide low impedance at higher > frequencies. Using power planes to form capacitors provides low > impedance across a range of very high frequencies that discrete > capacitors can't provide. > > 2) Discrete capacitors have effective series resistance (ESR), even > ceramics, which will mitigate the anti-resonance peak in impedance > created when more than one value/type of capacitor is used. If > multiple values of ceramic capacitors are used (more than two) the > peaks are typically well mitigated. The power planes also have some > effect in this but I seem to recall it was rather complicated with > lots of ripple at very high frequencies (> 1 GHz), possibly having to > do with reflections at the edges of the board, standing waves > perhaps? What I took away from this was to use 1, 10 and 100 nF > ceramic caps in addition to the power planes and you should be > good. You don't need TONS of each part. Lee showed us how to > calculate the requirement, but it was based on knowledge of the > current spikes of your chips. If you don't know that there is no way > to actually know what your PDS requirements are. I've never seen > this data on any of the chips I use... > > 3) When good power planes are used, discrete capacitors do not need > to be extremely close to the chip they are decoupling. In essence > the distance to the cap creates a "delay" in action while the E field > propagates to the cap and back to the chip. The capacitance of the > power plane provides adequate decoupling during this delay > time. Think of the power plane as a very low impedance transmission > line. Lee actually constructed a test board and measured the results > as the decoupling cap was placed up to more than an inch away from > the chip (maybe as much as three inches?). The difference in voltage > variation at the chip was small. > > I hate to be spouting all this off because I have not had a lot of > opportunity to verify it. I may have learned some of it wrong. But > I am sure it will get a good vetting here and I'll find out if I did > learn any of it wrong. > > BTW, in case you haven't figured it out, I highly recommend Lee's > class at speedingedge.com > > Rick > > > At 04:34 AM 3/11/2012, Aaditya Kandibanda wrote: >> Hello Rick, thank you very much, I am somewhat confused about the >> ground plane and power plane capacitance which is formed because of >> stack up, what is its importance? >> >> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Rick Collins >> <<mailto:gnuarm.2006@xxxxxxxxx>gnuarm.2006@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I don't think it can hurt the devices you are trying to supply power >> to, but some voltage regulators can be sensitive to low effective >> series resistance (ESR) capacitors, like ceramic caps. If you >> provide too many of the low ESR caps the total capacitance can >> destabilize the regulator to the point of oscillations. If this is a >> problem, they should tell you the upper limit of capacitance to use. >> Rick >> At 03:53 AM 3/11/2012, Aaditya Kandibanda wrote: >>> Hello Everyone, >>> I have a doubt on bypass capacitors, will there be any specific limit to >>> the capacitance I can use for bypassing? what if my bypass capacitance is >>> very large value? will it be okay? >>> >>> Thank you in advance, >>> Aaditya >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> <//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>//www.freelists.org/ >> webpage/si-list >>> For help: >>> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> List forum is accessible at: >>> >> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> >> <//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> <http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> <//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> with 'help' in the Subject field >> List forum is accessible at: >> >> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> >> <//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> <http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > -- Steve Weir IPBLOX, LLC 150 N. Center St. #211 Reno, NV 89501 www.ipblox.com (775) 299-4236 Business (866) 675-4630 Toll-free (707) 780-1951 Fax All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved. This e-mail may contain confidential material. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records and notify the sender. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu