[SI-LIST] Re: Bypass Capacitance?

  • From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:42:13 -0700

If PDN design could be adequately described in a few paragraphs, people 
wouldn't have design failures.

There are now some decent books dedicated to power distribution:  Iorga, 
Novak, Swaminathan, etc.  There are a number of other books that at 
least dedicate chapters to it:  Bogatin, Johnson, Ritchey, etc.   These 
are all worth studying.

Steve

On 3/11/2012 12:45 AM, Rick Collins wrote:
> First, let me say that I am no expert in power distribution system
> (PDS) design.  I took a class with Lee Ritchey a few years back and
> tried to absorb everything he taught in that class, which PDS was a
> small part of.  There were several points he made which stuck with
> me.  We'll see how well I remember...
> 1) To be effective, the impedance of the PDS has to be adequately low
> across the frequency spectrum.  Using a single value or type of
> capacitance won't give you that in most situations because capacitors
> are capacitive below their resonance and the impedance
> rises.  Capacitors are inductive above their frequency of resonance
> and the impedance also rises.  Larger values of electrolytic or
> tantalum capacitors are used to get low impedance at lower
> frequencies.  Ceramic caps provide low impedance at higher
> frequencies.  Using power planes to form capacitors provides low
> impedance across a range of very high frequencies that discrete
> capacitors can't provide.
>
> 2) Discrete capacitors have effective series resistance (ESR), even
> ceramics, which will mitigate the anti-resonance peak in impedance
> created when more than one value/type of capacitor is used.  If
> multiple values of ceramic capacitors are used (more than two) the
> peaks are typically well mitigated.  The power planes also have some
> effect in this but I seem to recall it was rather complicated with
> lots of ripple at very high frequencies (>  1 GHz), possibly having to
> do with reflections at the edges of the board, standing waves
> perhaps?  What I took away from this was to use 1, 10 and 100 nF
> ceramic caps in addition to the power planes and you should be
> good.  You don't need TONS of each part.  Lee showed us how to
> calculate the requirement, but it was based on knowledge of the
> current spikes of your chips.  If you don't know that there is no way
> to actually know what your PDS requirements are.  I've never seen
> this data on any of the chips I use...
>
> 3) When good power planes are used, discrete capacitors do not need
> to be extremely close to the chip they are decoupling.  In essence
> the distance to the cap creates a "delay" in action while the E field
> propagates to the cap and back to the chip.  The capacitance of the
> power plane provides adequate decoupling during this delay
> time.  Think of the power plane as a very low impedance transmission
> line.  Lee actually constructed a test board and measured the results
> as the decoupling cap was placed up to more than an inch away from
> the chip (maybe as much as three inches?).  The difference in voltage
> variation at the chip was small.
>
> I hate to be spouting all this off because I have not had a lot of
> opportunity to verify it.  I may have learned some of it wrong.  But
> I am sure it will get a good vetting here and I'll find out if I did
> learn any of it wrong.
>
> BTW, in case you haven't figured it out, I highly recommend Lee's
> class at speedingedge.com
>
> Rick
>
>
> At 04:34 AM 3/11/2012, Aaditya Kandibanda wrote:
>> Hello Rick, thank you very much, I am somewhat confused about the
>> ground plane and power plane capacitance which is formed because of
>> stack up, what is its importance?
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Rick Collins
>> <<mailto:gnuarm.2006@xxxxxxxxx>gnuarm.2006@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> I don't think it can hurt the devices you are trying to supply power
>> to, but some voltage regulators can be sensitive to low effective
>> series resistance (ESR) capacitors, like ceramic caps.  If you
>> provide too many of the low ESR caps the total capacitance can
>> destabilize the regulator to the point of oscillations.  If this is a
>> problem, they should tell you the upper limit of capacitance to use.
>> Rick
>> At 03:53 AM 3/11/2012, Aaditya Kandibanda wrote:
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>> I have a doubt on bypass capacitors, will there be any specific limit to
>>> the capacitance I can use for bypassing? what if my bypass capacitance is
>>> very large value? will it be okay?
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance,
>>> Aaditya
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>>> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>>> <//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>//www.freelists.org/
>> webpage/si-list
>>> For help:
>>> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    with 'help' in the Subject field
>>>
>>> List forum  is accessible at:
>>>
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>>
>>> List archives are viewable at:
>>>
>> <//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>>
>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>>>                  <http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> <//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>
>> For help:
>> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> with 'help' in the Subject field
>> List forum  is accessible at:
>>
>> <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>>
>> List archives are viewable at:
>>
>> <//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>>
>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>>                 <http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List forum  is accessible at:
>                 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>


-- 
Steve Weir
IPBLOX, LLC
150 N. Center St. #211
Reno, NV  89501
www.ipblox.com

(775) 299-4236 Business
(866) 675-4630 Toll-free
(707) 780-1951 Fax

All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
This e-mail may contain confidential material.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records
and notify the sender.

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: