[SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- From: "Robert Haller" <rhaller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <zanglinyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:06:28 -0500 (EST)
zanglinyuan
These blocking caps are often utilized to prevent voltage spikes from
damaging inputs when you hot swap modules. Depending which module you
intend to hot swap (driver or receiver) dictates where the Cap belongs.
Unless you are including all of the parasitics for pads you probably won't
see simulation differences. Depending on frequency, edge rates and layout
rules you may observe a difference in the lab.
Regards,
bob
www.sisoft.com
--
Robert Haller (rhaller@xxxxxxxxxx)
Signal Integrity Software Inc.
6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250
Maynard, MA 01754
Phone: (978) 461-0449, ext 15
>
> Hi.
> typically LVPECL to LVPECL interface (or others)using AC coupling as
> follows : There are pullup/pulldown resistors not illustrated.
> The first diagram use one capacitor and the second diagram use two
> capacitors to coupling the interface.
> I wann'a to know which one is better?
> What's the priority for each case?
>
> ____ ___
> |TX |-------||---------|RX |
> |___|-------||---------|___|
>
> ___ ___
> |TX |----||---------||---|RX |
> |___|----||---------||---|___|
>
>
.....
>> for above system ,when use one capacitor,where is better to place?
>>
>> By the way,The simulation result at receiver card is no difference
>> when we place one or two capacitor series in the circuit.
>>
>>
--
Robert Haller (rhaller@xxxxxxxxxx)
Signal Integrity Software Inc.
6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250
Maynard, MA 01754
Phone: (978) 461-0449, ext 15
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- From: Tae-Sik Cheung
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC coupling
- From: hariharan
- [SI-LIST] Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- From: zanglinyuan
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- From: Tae-Sik Cheung
- [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC coupling
- From: hariharan
- [SI-LIST] Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- From: zanglinyuan