[SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- From: "Michael E. Vrbanac" <vrbanacm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:32:55 -0600
Scott,
I wasn't terribly impressed. What was the point? That news is so old
its got mold on it.
I'm trying to figure out what it was for except to fill some space in EE
Times, was it a promotional
advertisement for a consultant, or promoting two companies and dissing
two, etc.? There were no
answers and no solutions offered, plenty of gloom and doom, the industry
is in the tank on this issue, and
there certainly doesn't seem to be enough simulator "pilots" to do all
the simulation we need to do and
everyone is to blame for "it" (whoever and whatever that is). I guess
that means we need to call in a
"superhero", eh? Frankly, we've had better discussions on this forum
about that topic than that was.
What a waste.
Enough of that...
I am hoping your query is to stimulate some constructive "forward
motion" toward solving the problem.
Its been around for a very long time.
Michael E. Vrbanac
Scott McMorrow wrote:
>I'd be interested in peoples thoughts about the following article from
>today's EE Times.
>
>http://www.eedesign.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=55801038
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- From: Scott McMorrow
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Article discussion on bad packages
- From: Scott McMorrow
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- [SI-LIST] Re: Article discussion on bad packages
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Article discussion on bad packages
- From: Scott McMorrow