[SI-LIST] Re: Amplitude loss ?
- From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rajneesh shukla <rajneeshs123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 03:34:05 -0800
Dielectric loss does not increase the effective impedance of either the
near-end or far-end ports.
Steve.
On 1/6/2012 3:14 AM, rajneesh shukla wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve but question remains unanswered !!
>
> I agree there will be a loss in energy due to dielectric loss but I
> was talking about loss in amplitude of signal (voltage) not loss in
> total energy, Energy loss does not always translates into voltage
> loss, right ? Receiver senses voltage( Potential Energy per unit
> charge) not total energy.
>
> As per basic circuit theory, If I have a driver that has zero o/p
> impedance is driving a 50 Ohm load and now if I connect 100 Ohm
> resistance across this load, Though there is energy loss due to 100
> ohm resistance but still my load will see the same voltage, agree ?
>
No I do not agree. If you change the port impedance you will change the
amount of energy absorbed and the amount of energy reflected.
> In transmission line, If series loss i.e. conductor loss is zero then
> I don't find the reason of any voltage drop in transmission line coz
> dielectric loss which is shunt loss can only dissipate total energy
> but can't change amplitude(voltage) of signal.
>
No I do not agree. If such a thing were true then you could heat your
coffee for free by making a long transmission line and setting your cup
on top of it.
>
> Do you find any discrepancy in this analogy ?
>
Yes: Conservation of Energy and Ohm's Law.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM, steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Follow the energy. Achieve enlightenment. Of the energy that a shunt
> draws, how much of that energy remains available to the signal?
>
> Steve.
> On 1/6/2012 12:54 AM, rajneesh shukla wrote:
> > Experts,
> > As we know for perfectly matched line insertion loss is due to
> ohmic&
> > dielctric losses and due to these losses we see loss in
> rise/fall time as
> > well as loss in amplitude of signal.
> >
> > My question is what actually affects amplitude loss, is it ohmic
> loss or
> > dielectric loss ? My understanding says, it should be ohmic loss as
> > it comes in series coz dielectric one is shunt loss. If this
> analogy is
> > correct then a channel having very low ohmic loss but significant
> > dielectric loss will have only changes in rise time but minimal
> amplitude
> > loss, right ??
> >
> > Rajneesh
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'unsubscribe' in the
> Subject field
> >
> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> > For help:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'help' in the Subject
> field
> >
> >
> > List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.net <http://www.si-list.net/>
> >
> > List archives are viewable at:
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >
> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Steve Weir
> IPBLOX, LLC
> 150 N. Center St. #211
> Reno, NV 89501
> www.ipblox.com <http://www.ipblox.com/>
>
> (775) 299-4236 Business
> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free
> (707) 780-1951 Fax
>
> All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
> This e-mail may contain confidential material.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records
> and notify the sender.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'unsubscribe' in the
> Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'help' in the Subject
> field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net <http://www.si-list.net/>
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
--
Steve Weir
IPBLOX, LLC
150 N. Center St. #211
Reno, NV 89501
www.ipblox.com
(775) 299-4236 Business
(866) 675-4630 Toll-free
(707) 780-1951 Fax
All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This e-mail may contain confidential material.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records
and notify the sender.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
