Hi Tegan, just one comment: a board stackup should be symmetrical. It may be that yours is, and that you already know this (as I only see the 6 layer part of it), but be aware that asymmetrical layer stackings can lead to serious warping of boards. The worst example I saw of this was a customer of ours, who (before becoming our customer!) had a board made by a competitor with the following stack: top-G-P-G-P-S-S-S-S-bottom Quite apart from it being an SI disaster, this asymmetry (even if the cores and prepregs are symmetrically ordered, in terms of thicknesses) = of 4 solid planes on one side will lead to MEGA bowing when the board is = then soldered, due to differences in thermal expansion coefficients - in the case of our customers, all boards had to be junked, since the warping stress caused the fracturing of many internal via-plating connections, rendering them useless. Results might not be so drastic if the asymmetry is only slight, but I would avoid it if possible! ____________________________________ Sol Tatlow, M.Eng. (Oxon) ProDesign Electronic & CAD Layout GmbH Product Developer Albert-Mayer-Str. 16 D-83052 Bruckmuehl Phone: +49 (0) 8062-808-302 Fax: +49 (0) 8062-808-333 Mailto:sol.tatlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.prodesign-europe.com ____________________________________=20 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = Im Auftrag von Tegan Campbell Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Mai 2004 23:22 An: silist Betreff: [SI-LIST] signal layer between pwr/gnd layers All, In trying to remove two layers from a 16 layer PCB I came up with a = question I don't know how to answer short of building a board, which there is not time for. I have closed the loop on simulation/modeling vs measurement for a PDS = with embedded capacitor using a 4 mil dielectric and capacitor array. I want = to say thank you to Sun and Xilinx for the excellent work and papers they = have published in the public domain on the subject. Now, I am having trouble working out what would happen if I insert a = signal layer in between the planes. I need three signal layers to be = referenced to a pwr/gnd pair, and that currently takes six layers(G-S-S-P-G-S). If I = can insert a signal routing layer between pwr and gnd, it drops to five layers(S-P-S-G-S). This happens on two different pwr rails. My first reaction is the only difference would be the ~doubling of the distance between the planes. I can decrease this effect by using 3 mil cores. =20 After thinking a while longer, it seems like there would be other differences from the copper in between the planes. It seems like I = should be able to minimize the effect by using special spacing rules in the = signal layer between the planes to maximize the ratio of dieletric area to = copper. I think this would make the discontinuities in the dielctric(the copper traces) insignificant. I have not found a discussion of this specific PDS topic in the = archives, and I apologize in advance if I am repeating something that has already = been discussed. Any input or thoughts are appreciated, thank you for your time. Tegan Campbell ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu