Hallo Marc Yes, we did a board with GND on the top and bottom and microvia 1-2 and 2-3 etc. We used microvia i caps and absolute no traces on the outer sides. We found that this way the GND areal was larger on the top layer than on second layer if you use normal trhough via's. It works fine. Our board also had an FPGA and DDR2. Plus a PPC and a DSP both wih DDR2. We had both sides completely filled with components incl. big BGA's on both sides and therefore need maximum routability. Because of extreme density our buried via went from layer 3 instead of 2. You can save a lot on cost if you can live with the buried from layer 2. The cost is not set by the number of layers as many thinks, but more by the number of pressings and plating. You can add layers in the mittle for small cost. Consider if you can really make god power with one layer,depends on how many different powers you have. We had 14 layers with two signal layers in the mittle. Be sure to have absolut minimum dielectric between Power and GND to get a large high frequency cap. Also be sure to add enough decoupling caps to be able to change half of them to a lower value. I recommend doing SI simulations especially if you like us skips normal DDR2 termination power. Best regards Peter Sørensen On Tors, Juli 10, 2008 16:22, Marc Battyani wrote: > Hello, > > We are designing a small 8L board with the following stackup: > S/G/S/G/P/S/G/S (S = signal, P = power, G = ground) > > The most notable components are a few DDR2 (533) around an FPGA. > > If we use microvias on the layers 1-2, 2-3, 6-7,7-8, we can route most > of the fast signals on the layers 1 and 3. With no microvias, we have to > use all the layers. > To keep the 50 Ohm tracks at a reasonable width, we use 100µm (4mils) > dielectric thickness for the layers 1-2-3 and 6-7-8. > > Are we missing a better PCB stackup? > Anybody tried something like G/S/S/G/P/S/S/G? > > Can you recommend a good PCB shop able to make a few prototypes (+-10) > at a reasonable cost? > (We have been given very high prices for this so far) > > Thanks, > > Marc > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu