[shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- From: Rangel Dokov <rangel_dokov@xxxxxx>
- To: shkola@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:51:47 +0300
On Monday 23 June 2003 19:34, you wrote:
>Daze moga da ti kaza i koga ste e pecelevisha igrata. Kogato
>saotnoshenieto gubesti srestu pecelivshi redove e n:n+1 ako sme parvi na
>hod.... ahahah sasnost se polucava absolutno sastite kombinacii i po
>y. toest kombinaciite ti po x za pozciite ti se transformirat v
>kombinaciite ti po y za redovete vmesto poziciite tozi pat :). I taka
>stava kodirane samo 2^10:)
Ljudo izvinqvaj obache _nishto ne razbrah_. Da imash neshto protiv
da obqsnish za kakvo govorish tochno, pone za koq ot dvete zadachi na
Ivo.
--
Rangel Dokov
- Follow-Ups:
- [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- From: Ivaylo Riskov
- References:
- [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- From: Lyudmil Antonov
Other related posts:
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- » [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- From: Ivaylo Riskov
- [shkola] Re: Malko teoriq na igrite (long)
- From: Lyudmil Antonov