[shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: ilmcuts <ilmcuts@xxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 22:22:22 +0200
At 15:40 29.05.2003 -0400, Kevin Schaffer wrote:
The litestep window should probably be created with HWND_MESSAGE, which
would avoid zorder all together (on systems where it's supported)
That's probably a good idea, but it would break a lot of existing modules
since a non-message window can't have a message window parent.
I'm not sure if it's a good idea... iirc this crashes on 9x. I tried that
with label I think. MSDN says HWND_MESSAGE is 2k/xp up only, so it might
even crash on NT4.
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: rabidcow
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: Kevin Schaffer
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
The litestep window should probably be created with HWND_MESSAGE, which would avoid zorder all together (on systems where it's supported)
That's probably a good idea, but it would break a lot of existing modules since a non-message window can't have a message window parent.
__________________________________________________ Subscription options and archive: http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: rabidcow
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: Kevin Schaffer