[shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: Kevin Schaffer <kschaffe@xxxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:40:22 -0400
The litestep window should probably be created with HWND_MESSAGE, which
would avoid zorder all together (on systems where it's supported)
That's probably a good idea, but it would break a lot of existing
modules since a non-message window can't have a message window parent.
--
Maduin
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: ilmcuts
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: rabidcow
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- » [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
The litestep window should probably be created with HWND_MESSAGE, which
would avoid zorder all together (on systems where it's supported)
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: ilmcuts
- [shell-coding] Re: owner/owned zorder
- From: rabidcow