[shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Ravi/Shell-Shocked <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Joachim Calvert <shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 02:35:27 +0100
> You know, I always end up thinking this list has died,
> ceased to be, expired, become an ex-list, &c... Then
> someone surprises the heck out of me by posting something.
> :P
Yeah - I always wonder if it's going to fold. I guess the
important thing is that there are over a hundred people on
this list interested in shell-coding (however mildly).
When someone needs to ask something, it's here - traffic or
no.
Probably needs to be advertised a bit more - I wonder if
there are many people who'd be interested who have no idea
about it.
I think only Shell-Shocked and Shellfront have links for it.
> Kind of reminds me of the Stuff list in that way...
It does indeed. Haven't seen anything on that for a while.
--
Ravi (http://shell-shocked.org)
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Kevin Schaffer
- [shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Ravi/Shell-Shocked
- [shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Joachim Calvert
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- » [shell-coding] Re: motion
- [shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Kevin Schaffer
- [shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Ravi/Shell-Shocked
- [shell-coding] Re: motion
- From: Joachim Calvert