[shell-coding] Re: cvs
- From: Shaheen Gandhi <sgandhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 03:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
What's wrong with read-only from perforce.com? It is all open source
isn't it? Or is this not for litestep?
And yes, I love source depot :) The only thing it doesn't have (like
perforce) is an undo after a commit, but I don't know of any sccs that
does.
- Visigoth
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 Bgvinyard@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In a message dated 7/11/2002 11:08:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> sgandhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Perforce is a frickin' awesome sccs. Their free-for-use license is a
> > bit strange, but you might be able to use it for free.
> >
> > And yes, it requires a log message for each checkin.
> >
> > - Visigoth
> >
>
> Straight from their open source license agreement...
>
> "Customer will configure the Server to allow it to receive connections from
> software
> programs running on Perforce’s computer systems, and to permit unrestricted
> access to any
> Read-Only User who connects to Customer’s Server via such a connection."
>
> Uhmm... no thanks....
>
> Message
>
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- From: Bgvinyard
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] cvs
- » [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- » [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- » [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- » [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- » [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- [shell-coding] Re: cvs
- From: Bgvinyard