[shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- From: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:20:44 +0100 (BST)
Arrgh - I thought winshellex had died a death! (See my post on
www.k23productions.com) - goddammit, that means yet again I'm developing
something which someone else is also developing. Cue flame emails,
allegations of copying, etc, etc... ;-)
What's the pace of winshellex development? I had a look at the page off
the link you posted and had a quick browse around CVS. I'd like to help
but would my lack of C++ knowledge yada yada would really hamper that?
Also, what's the view within the winshellex team (and the geOShell team
for that matter) of replacement shells? Has the bubble burst, or are
people simply waiting for the Next Big Thing? Whatever that is, of
course...
:)
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- From: Colin 'CMF' Verot
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Colin 'CMF' Verot
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: stan
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Chris Sutcliffe
- [shell-coding] WinShellEx
- From: Jaykul
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] WinShellEx
- » [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- » [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- » [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- » [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- » [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- [shell-coding] Re: WinShellEx
- From: Colin 'CMF' Verot
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Colin 'CMF' Verot
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: stan
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Chris Sutcliffe
- [shell-coding] WinShellEx
- From: Jaykul