[shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: bill barry <after.fallout@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:05:30 -0400
Litestep is the only reason I still use windows. I have thought about
porting it, now with the implementation of netloadmodule, it might be
capable of being actually cross platform. Someone just needs to take
the time to do the following:
make the modules compile to libraries in linux(in itself that is a big
chore, mabye write a wrapper for the modules)
then write some program that would take the modules source and compile
them on the linux machines (this program would replace netloadmodule)
make the file parser more modularized, so that it can be moved over to
other shells(I am working on a parser that could fit this bill)
Once those 3 things are done, many themes written for windows could
actually already work in linux (so long as they are OTS 2 and the
modules they use also release the source, as many of them do).
On 4/28/05, Joshua Blocher <verbalshadow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> on the off topic linux thing yes quiet a few former litestep users are
> now linux users and i for one miss LS bad it is in fact the only
> thing i really miss from windows. I love to see it ported, to point me
> in the direction need to start myself.
>
> josh
> verbalshadow
>
> On 4/26/05, Chris Sutcliffe <ironhead@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Welcome to the list Stan!
> >
> > > Here's hoping! I noticed the archives weren't very busy - I wonder if
> > > this is because no-one's interested in replacement shells anymore?
> >
> > The list has it's ups and downs, unfortunately, it's been on a downward
> > trend recently. ilm posted a little bit a while back, but unfortunately,
> > he's disappeared again (if memory serves he was busy with Real Life).
> >
> > Unfortunately, the interest in alt. shells also seems to have cooled off
> > as well (guess a lot of people are on the Linux bandwagon).
> >
> > As for solving undocumented calls (and/or understanding some of the
> > archaic win32 calls) I'm all for it. A pet project of mine is trying to
> > get SetShellWindow and SetShellWindowEx to work nicely with using Windows
> > Explorer as a file manager. That's what actually sparked the
> > SHChangeNotifyRegister discussion, since windows doesn't refresh the
> > 'save' dialogs when an application other than explorer sets itself as the
> > shell window (using the SetShellWindow function).
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > Chris
> > _______________
> > Chris Sutcliffe
> > ironhead@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.emergedesktop.org
> > http://ironhead.modblog.com
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Subscription options and archive:
> > http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
>
>
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Joshua Blocher
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Colin 'CMF' Verot
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: stan
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Chris Sutcliffe
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Joshua Blocher
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Joshua Blocher
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Colin 'CMF' Verot
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: stan
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Chris Sutcliffe
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Joshua Blocher