[shell-coding] Re: Sh

There are people here on the list, it just isn't that active of a
list. I don't know what other litestep people are here, but I am and I
am pretty sure ilmcuts is. I follow because I am interested and
because I do code. It does kinda suck that the list isn't very active
but I guess that is because there isn't that much changing that all
the shells need to deal with(yeah, each of the shells are changing,
but they are still being done for the same os, and that isn't
changing). I would like to see the list liven up with more pointers
for how people deal with problems that the OS presents(undocumented
syscalls and whatnot). Because of the project that I am working on I
would like to see the list become more active too(a new parser for
litestep; should be able to be incorporated into other engines as
well, if it is liked and the shell is written in c++).

On 4/25/05, Helder <helder4u@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Welcome Stan!
> 
> I also follow this list, but am not experienced enough to code alone..
> Hope to cach some knowledge..
> Well met!
> Helder
> 
> stan skrev:
> 
> >Incidentally, you can follow the progress of my toolkit over at my blog:
> >
> >http://stan51.blogspot.com/
> >
> >;)
> >
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
> 
>

__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding

Other related posts: