[shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: bill barry <after.fallout@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:55:25 -0400
Well, we would need some kind of backend to support the modules.
I don't think that Litestep is ready to be ported to another system
(yet) just keep this window manager in mind when we go to do so.
On 5/5/05, Joshua Blocher <verbalshadow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I was think about just being lazy and just using winelib and then
> write a program to change the required lines in the src of modules and
> compiling them. :) but a pure linux implemention would be great.
>
> Josh
>
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
>
>
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Gdi+ and XP Icons -- A Solution
- From: Hollow
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: bill barry
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Joshua Blocher
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- » [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- [shell-coding] Gdi+ and XP Icons -- A Solution
- From: Hollow
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: bill barry
- [shell-coding] Re: Sh
- From: Joshua Blocher