[shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs

No, it's not.  Here are the major character sets:

ASCII: Single byte character set we know and love
MBCS: "Multi-Byte Character Set" - Implemented by Microsoft's C-Runtime
(I haven't heard of it being used elsewhere btw)
UNICODE: While it certainly uses multiple bytes to represent various
characters, it's just not known as multi-byte.

- Visigoth

> -----Original Message-----
> From: shell-coding-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:shell-coding-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daij-Djan
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:27 AM
> To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
> 
> 
> Unicode is not the same as multi-byte character support, is 
> it? There sure is a difference
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shell-coding-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:shell-coding-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nexistenz
> Sent: Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 07:25
> To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
> 
> > What do you mean by an XML parser that supports Unicode? All XML 
> > parsers are required to support Unicode.
> Like I said non-validating, and non-conforming. XML Parser 
> from destructor.de for 
> example only supports single-byte character sets. I was 
> looking for a small, and fast 
> parser that has multi-byte support. Looking over Expat it 
> does exactly what I want 
> and more. Guess it's time to scrap the work I've already done 
> and impliment Expat.
> 
> Nexistenz - Morphing Dwarfs
>  delusive.loose-screws.com
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive: 
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive: 
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding

Other related posts: