[shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: "Daij-Djan" <Daij-Djan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:26:48 +0100
Unicode is not the same as multi-byte character support, is it?
There sure is a difference
-----Original Message-----
From: shell-coding-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:shell-coding-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nexistenz
Sent: Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 07:25
To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
> What do you mean by an XML parser that supports Unicode? All XML
> parsers are required to support Unicode.
Like I said non-validating, and non-conforming. XML Parser from
destructor.de for
example only supports single-byte character sets. I was looking for a
small, and fast
parser that has multi-byte support. Looking over Expat it does exactly
what I want
and more. Guess it's time to scrap the work I've already done and
impliment Expat.
Nexistenz - Morphing Dwarfs
delusive.loose-screws.com
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: Shaheen Gandhi
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: Nexistenz
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: Shaheen Gandhi
- [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: Nexistenz