[shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs

What do you mean by an XML parser that supports Unicode? All XML
parsers are required to support Unicode.

Expat is nice and small. It doesn't give you a DOM, but if you need an
in memory tree structure then you could just build your own.

--
Kevin Schaffer


Nexistenz wrote:

I've been shopping around for an XML parsing engine that supports Unicode and I've come to the conclusion that one doesn't exist under 500k. Now my question simply what's so damn special about XML that it requires such a large library? I can understand parsers that validate, but even the ones that explicitly state they're non-
validating, and non-conforming while still supporting unicode are in the 500k area. Any ideas on something that's smaller while still being as fast as libxml2?

Nexistenz - Pondering reinventing the wheel

__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding






__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding

Other related posts: