[shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs

Well, I don't know much about it, but I assume Mozilla's got something?  XUL 
looks like the 
next big thing in UI's ... and their debugging tools do some sweet things with 
the xml that 
makes up webpages.
--
qotd: Keep out of ruts: a rut is something which if travelled too much, becomes 
a ditch.
 - Arthur Guiterman: 1871-1943
::Joel

On 27 Oct 2002 at 20:20, Nexistenz wrote:

> > What sort of parser are you looking for? How do you want to use it?
> > I mean, if you're wanting to walk XML from code ... 
> > have you tried using Microsoft's XML Core Services?
> I'm using it as a configuration setup much like Trillian does. The 
> main reason I've 
> ruled out msxml is because of it's lack of portability not to mention 
> it's speed. Since 
> Linux now has Kylix portability has become a real issue to me. I 
> really like the idea 
> that I can design something on one platform, and run it on the other 
> with little if any 
> changes. Now if only Borland would port the RTL to OS X I'd be in 
> love.
> 
> Nexistenz - Morphing Dwarfs
>  delusive.loose-screws.com
> 
> Nexistenz - Morphing Dwarfs
>  delusive.loose-screws.com
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Subscription options and archive:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
> 
> 

--
::Jaykul
Jaykul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://fragmentized.com/jaykul


__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding

Other related posts: