[shell-coding] Question concerning XML libs
- From: "Nexistenz" <nexistenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:12:50 -0500
I've been shopping around for an XML parsing engine that supports
Unicode and I've come to the conclusion that one doesn't exist
under 500k. Now my question simply what's so damn special about
XML that it requires such a large library? I can understand parsers
that validate, but even the ones that explicitly state they're non-
validating, and non-conforming while still supporting unicode are in
the 500k area. Any ideas on something that's smaller while still
being as fast as libxml2?
Nexistenz - Pondering reinventing the wheel
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: Kevin Schaffer
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: LS 0.25 design forum
- From: Brandon Sneed
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- » [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- [shell-coding] Re: Question concerning XML libs
- From: Kevin Schaffer
- [shell-coding] Re: LS 0.25 design forum
- From: Brandon Sneed