[shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?

From: Ravi/Shell-Shocked <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "A. Klingenstein on Shell-Coding" <shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:17:13 +0000

> I just downloaded CachemanXP 1.1. Can't find anything like this in its
> helpfile
> 20.02.2004  01:42           293.388 CachemanXP.chm

Alex, That's the one. Check the FAQ in the help file, the very
last item.

(Oddly searching for "shell" and "litestep" in the help file
doesn't yield any results as you probably saw, but it *is*
there.)

Creating that "Shell" reg entry does the job of showing the
systray icon for me. (On both purels and litestep.)

-- 
Ravi (http://shell-shocked.org)

"Avoid hangovers: Stay drunk!"


__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding

References:

[shell-coding] Odd systray interface?
From: Ravi/Shell-Shocked

[shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
From: A. Klingenstein

[shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?

Other related posts: