[shell-coding] Odd systray interface?
- From: Ravi/Shell-Shocked <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Shell-Coding <shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:42:39 +0000
Something interesting - most of my applications work fine with
the systray, however I noticed I had to do something special with
CachemanXP:
,----- [ CachemanXP help file ]
| You must let CachemanXP know the name of your Shell executable,
| to do it create a new Shell , example for LiteStep:
|
| [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\CachemanXP]
| "Shell"="Litestep.exe"
`-----
I'm just curious as to what this program might be doing
differently from others.
--
Ravi (http://shell-shocked.org)
"Quantum Physics: If you ate pasta and antipasti, would you still
be hungry? - George Carlin"
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- From: A. Klingenstein
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] Odd systray interface?
- » [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- » [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- » [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- » [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- » [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- [shell-coding] Re: Odd systray interface?
- From: A. Klingenstein