[shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- From: Kevin Schaffer <kschaffe@xxxxxxxx>
- To: shell-coding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:59:03 -0400
To me ... the crowning reason for using the registry is the ability to
be notified whenever a setting changes ... which could theoritically
mean dynamic configs without manually recycling
By the way, this ability is not available on Win95. That might
not mean anything to you but it does to me.
--
Maduin
__________________________________________________
Subscription options and archive:
http://www.freelists.org/list/shell-coding
- Follow-Ups:
- [shell-coding] win98 and codepage errors...
- From: e-sushi
- References:
- [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- From: Jaykul
Other related posts:
- » [shell-coding] CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- » [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
To me ... the crowning reason for using the registry is the ability to be notified whenever a setting changes ... which could theoritically mean dynamic configs without manually recycling
- [shell-coding] win98 and codepage errors...
- From: e-sushi
- [shell-coding] Re: CPP variable storage question
- From: Jaykul