[sac-forum] Re: tonight
- From: Steve Palmer <sapalmer_98@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
I concur, it is very, very windy where I am now and the wx links from others do
not look all that great. Besides, after the last long, misguided,
misinterperted thread. I believe it best for me to just remain @ home. I will
leave everyone to their own peace of mind. And wishing everyone who ventures
out a beautiful and clear skies night. Peace to all and may the photons shower
upon one and all....
Sincerely,
Steve Palmer
Richard Harshaw <rharshaw2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I echo your conclusions and best wishes for the other folks, Peter. Good
luck, all, and hope your skies are better than the forecasts are showing.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Peter Argenziano
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 1:16 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: tonight
For all those heading out tonight, I wish you a good night out!
After poring over the data I have decided to forego this evening. The
forecasted cloudiness is more than I wish to contend with, but it is really
the transparency that will keep me inside (or at least away from the
eyepiece).
Hopefully I am wrong and you will all have a great night out!
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hanrahan"
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: tonight
> I'm up for either. At this point, I'll take just about any form of
> observing, including the kind that includes a dark site, comfortable lawn
> chair, good conversation and a cirrus smattered sky.
> Chris Hanrahan
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- From: Dan Gruber
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- From: Richard Harshaw
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- » [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- From: Dan Gruber
- [sac-forum] Re: tonight
- From: Richard Harshaw