[sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:43:52 -0700
Tom., aw shucks you could have at least teased David and said you were
contemplating a 40" :))
Clear skies
aj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Polakis" <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:38 AM
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
No, David, I'm not going to follow your lead.
Tom
---- "david.fredericksen" <david.fredericksen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom,
Are you thinking of upgrading to something similar? Just curious.
Clear Skies,
David
Tom Polakis wrote:
>At last night's meeting, we learned that Large Scale Synoptic Survey has
>a large Étendue, which is defined as the telescope's light gathering area
>multiplied by the field of view. The Étendue for the LSST is 319 m^2
>deg^2.
>
>I became curious what the Étendue is for my 10" and Philips ToUCam when
>it's at the same image scale of 0.2" per pixel. I calculate 0.0000480
>m^2 deg^2.
>
>The Étendue of the LSST will be 6.6 million times larger than my backyard
>setup.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] RE: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: david.fredericksen
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: Tom Polakis
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
Tom,
Are you thinking of upgrading to something similar? Just curious.
Clear Skies,
David
Tom Polakis wrote:
>At last night's meeting, we learned that Large Scale Synoptic Survey has
>a large Étendue, which is defined as the telescope's light gathering area
>multiplied by the field of view. The Étendue for the LSST is 319 m^2
>deg^2.
>>I became curious what the Étendue is for my 10" and Philips ToUCam when >it's at the same image scale of 0.2" per pixel. I calculate 0.0000480 >m^2 deg^2.
>>The Étendue of the LSST will be 6.6 million times larger than my backyard >setup.
> >Tom > > >
- [sac-forum] RE: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: david.fredericksen
- [sac-forum] Re: [sac-forum] Re: Étendues Big and Small
- From: Tom Polakis