[sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- From: "Dan Gruber" <dgruber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:39:41 -0700
I don't have a SQM or a ham radio, but I'd be happy to take a daytime or
nighttime trip someplace with my compass, GPS, and camera. (Of course,
if we do this on 3/10 or thereabouts, I'll also take my scope. There are
some celestial observations I'd like to make after 2 months of
rain-outs, in addition to the domestic ones we're talking about!)
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Goodwin
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 2:16 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Tom Polakis'
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
Me too.
Andrew
Steve Rodgers wrote:
> I haven't been observing long enough for it to matter, frankly, where
we go.
> I'm still working on the Messier list, heh heh. Hovatter, Dirt Road,
> Saddle, Flat Iron -- I don't care. They are all an improvement over
my back
> yard.
>
> But, if you need/want someone with an SQM, a GPS and a ham radio, or
just
> someone to go drive out somewhere, consider me a volunteer.
>
> Steve Rodgers
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- From: Andrew Goodwin
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- » [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- [sac-forum] Re: Wednesday Night's Site Evaluations
- From: Andrew Goodwin