[sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: SAC-Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:28:37 -0700
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:18:05 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote:
> I feel it is a fallacy to assume a waiver offers any protection, club
> or individual.
Could you please provide some evidence that our lawyer is wrong than just
your feelings?
-Paul
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- References:
- [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Bob Christ
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Bob Christ
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins