[sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: SAC-Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:01:00 -0700
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:47:36 -0800, Stan Gorodenski wrote:
> That is good we agree that amendments should not be voted on in the same
> meeting they are proposed. However, the wording of the change is:
> This Constitution shall be amended only by consent of a majority of the
> voting membership at a regular or special business meeting called for
> that purpose_ or the regular meeting following submission_. Any
> amendment so passed shall take effect immediately.
The problem with "a regular or special business meeting called for that
purpose" is it can be parsed as "a (regular) or (special business meeting
called for that purpose)". See the discussion in SAC-Board's archive:
"Let's do Step A. under Article X this Friday regarding the waivers."
-Paul
Other related posts:
