[sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:19:25 -0700
Answer:
If I did not attend it might be because I feel the waivers are wrong.
I do not believe in frivolous suing or suing in general and that is
not why I am against the waiver. It is highly unlikely anything could
happen that would cause me to seek litigation. I never have and most
likely never will sued anyone.
I see the waivers as a threat. People are being threatened that if
they do not sign, something bad will happen to them (bounced from the
club, ejected from the event, shunned by the event promoters, ...).
Astronomy events used to be most enjoyable and of value. Waivers
would have a detrimental effect on that. I have attended several
RTMCs and never had to sign a waiver. I have attended many events
that could be classified as dangerous (e.g., motocross racing as
participant and observer) and have never had to sign waivers. To me
requiring them for star parties is ludicrous.
Jeff
At 14:39 -0700 8/25/05, Paul Dickson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:28:52 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote:
At 11:28 -0700 8/25/05, Paul Dickson wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:18:05 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote:
>
>> I feel it is a fallacy to assume a waiver offers any protection, club
>> or individual.
>
>Could you please provide some evidence that our lawyer is wrong than just
>your feelings?
I think it would be wise to contact another lawyer.
I agree contacting another lawyer might be wise. But making claims when
given evidence against it isn't.
SAC has other reasons for possibly using another lawyer not related to
your claims. Whether we do or don't will be up to the board.
I have a question for you. Would attend or not attend the 2006 Messier
Marathon strictly based on whether a signed liability release was
required? If not, why not.
-Paul
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
7812 West Clayton Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
www.hposoft.com
- References:
- [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Bob Christ
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- » [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:28:52 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote:
At 11:28 -0700 8/25/05, Paul Dickson wrote: >On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:18:05 -0700, Jeff Hopkins wrote: > >> I feel it is a fallacy to assume a waiver offers any protection, club >> or individual. > >Could you please provide some evidence that our lawyer is wrong than just >your feelings?
I think it would be wise to contact another lawyer.
I agree contacting another lawyer might be wise. But making claims when given evidence against it isn't.
SAC has other reasons for possibly using another lawyer not related to your claims. Whether we do or don't will be up to the board.
I have a question for you. Would attend or not attend the 2006 Messier Marathon strictly based on whether a signed liability release was required? If not, why not.
-Paul
-- Jeff Hopkins HPO SOFT Hopkins Phoenix Observatory http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
- [sac-forum] Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Bob Christ
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....
- From: Paul Dickson