[sac-forum] Re: Waiver-amendment debate.....

On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:54:25 -0800, Stan Gorodenski wrote:

> You made my point about being vague. I had assumed at least a month 
> would pass before being considered at a meeting. From what you said, it 
> appears an issue could be brought up for vote without members having 
> been aware prior to the meeting that something like an amendment to the 
> bylaws would be voted on. If I am wrong about my preception of what you 
> just said, than it is because the proposed amendment is vague, the point 
> I am making. Further, my main concern is that the change will curtail 
> the current timeframe and procedure whereby members can become well 
> aware that something of importance will be considered at an upcoming 
> meeting.

Currently, amendments can be voted on at the same meeting they are
submitted.  That's why I'm changing it.

        -Paul

Other related posts: