[sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- From: "Spencer, Darrell" <DSpencer@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:11:52 -0700
Great idea, Gene! I second the suggestion! She was proud of the nod - and I
don't blame her, especially given its origin.
-Darrell
________________________________
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of gene lucas
Sent: Wed 7/23/2008 5:46 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
I think it would be good to include "Jennifer's Confluence" - Polakis 1
in the SAC Asterisms database, either as the 111th object, or by
deleting one of the other well-known items, such as a big "constellation"...
Gene Lucas
(17250)
Steve Coe wrote:
>
> Howdy all;
>
>
>
> I am just getting done with an update to the SAC databases. If you
> have any input about the deep sky, double star, red star or asterism
> databases then please let me know right away.
>
>
>
> I have spent much time over the past several months getting the data
> as clean as I can and I would like any help you can provide if you
> have found an error or an addition of a famous object that we missed
> let me know.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your time and effort;
>
> Steve Coe
>
- References:
- [sac-forum] Update input for SAC databases
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- From: gene lucas
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- [sac-forum] Update input for SAC databases
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- From: gene lucas