[sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- From: gene lucas <geneluca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:46:50 -0700
I think it would be good to include "Jennifer's Confluence" - Polakis 1
in the SAC Asterisms database, either as the 111th object, or by
deleting one of the other well-known items, such as a big "constellation"...
Gene Lucas
(17250)
Steve Coe wrote:
Howdy all;
I am just getting done with an update to the SAC databases. If you
have any input about the deep sky, double star, red star or asterism
databases then please let me know right away.
I have spent much time over the past several months getting the data
as clean as I can and I would like any help you can provide if you
have found an error or an addition of a famous object that we missed
let me know.
Thanks for your time and effort;
Steve Coe
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- From: Spencer, Darrell
- References:
- [sac-forum] Update input for SAC databases
- From: Steve Coe
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- » [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
Howdy all;I am just getting done with an update to the SAC databases. If you have any input about the deep sky, double star, red star or asterism databases then please let me know right away. I have spent much time over the past several months getting the data as clean as I can and I would like any help you can provide if you have found an error or an addition of a famous object that we missed let me know.
Thanks for your time and effort; Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: Update input for SAC databases
- From: Spencer, Darrell
- [sac-forum] Update input for SAC databases
- From: Steve Coe