[sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: AJ Crayon <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 19:41:46 -0700
I concur with Jeff that, indirectly, concurs with Steve. I also see
that Thad is trying to make contact with ASC to see if we are to meet
there or not. Speaking of meeting venu, does anyone know our speakers name?
Clear skies,
aj
Jeff Hopkins wrote:
I concur with Steve. This should be presented at a meeting at our
regular meeting location. Also it might give more time to allow
discussions and a pro/con statement in the September Newsletter.
Jeff
At 11:49 -0700 9/9/05, Steve Coe wrote:
Rick Rotrammel sent me a private message that said that the meeting
is at
the planetarium. I do not wish to have this "business" transacted
and vote
at a such a public meeting.
If that is the truth, then let's postpone this until we are at our usual
room.
(Does this sound like your Mother saying "we will discuss this when I
get
you HOME")
Jennifer? Where is the meeting?
Steve Coe
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Rick Tejera
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Stan Gorodenski
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Jeff Hopkins
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- » [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
Jeff
At 11:49 -0700 9/9/05, Steve Coe wrote:
Rick Rotrammel sent me a private message that said that the meeting is at
the planetarium. I do not wish to have this "business" transacted and vote
at a such a public meeting.
If that is the truth, then let's postpone this until we are at our usual room.
(Does this sound like your Mother saying "we will discuss this when I get
you HOME")
Jennifer? Where is the meeting?
Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Rick Tejera
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Stan Gorodenski
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: This upcoming meeting and the amendment discussion.
- From: Jeff Hopkins