[sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: "Richard Harshaw" <rharshaw2@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:49:20 -0700
Well, yes, HAL lied (to protect the mission-- debate has raged since 2001's
publication on whether or not HAL was technically at fault for this).
Anyway, hoping the best for you, Andrew!
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Goodwin
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:56 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
Thanks Richard, but didn't HAL lie about the AE35 unit? Only my wife
knows the truth. They won't talk to me anymore.
Andrew
Richard Harshaw wrote:
Andrew, horrendous news! I hope the scan turns out well for you and that it
is just a faulty Alpha-Echo 3-5 unit!
Dick H
- References:
- [sac-forum] Sky clock
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Paul Lind
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Andrew Goodwin
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- » [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- [sac-forum] Sky clock
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Paul Lind
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Richard Harshaw
- [sac-forum] Re: Sky clock
- From: Andrew Goodwin