[sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: AJ Crayon <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:49:37 -0700
Matt, does your reference give anything like last year measured? The
database lists 1875 as last year. I wonder if the slight differences
can be attributed to the observed dates.
Your reference to STTA is verddy, veddy interesting. Actually my
reference, Sky Catalog 2000.0 circa 1985, lists the O-sigma-sigma
designation but doesn't have anything for the IDS code. For the
original catalog the designation O-sigma has the IDS code STT. This
could easily lead to this type of confusion - using the same code (STT)
for two different catalogs - Pulkovo and its supplement .
What is the published date for the STF 2000.0 catalog?
aj
Matt Luttinen wrote:
>Hello AJ and everybody,
>
>I believe the double in question is STTA 105 from Otto Struve's Pulkovo
>Appendix, annotated as "O-sigma-sigma" in some double lists. My source is
>the STF 2000.0 Catalog, kindly borrowed (some time ago) from Steve Coe.
>
>STF 2000.0 has the following data:
>
>RA: 10h29m53.7s DEC: +28d34m52s m1=6.8 m2=7.8 pa=226 sep=133.6 arcsec
>
>This is an extremely wide double, if the facts are correct.
>
>Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: Matt Luttinen
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: Matt Luttinen
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: Matt Luttinen
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: Matt Luttinen