[sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: "Matt Luttinen" <mluttinen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:17:35 -0700
Hello AJ and everybody,
I believe the double in question is STTA 105 from Otto Struve's Pulkovo
Appendix, annotated as "O-sigma-sigma" in some double lists. My source is
the STF 2000.0 Catalog, kindly borrowed (some time ago) from Steve Coe.
STF 2000.0 has the following data:
RA: 10h29m53.7s DEC: +28d34m52s m1=6.8 m2=7.8 pa=226 sep=133.6 arcsec
This is an extremely wide double, if the facts are correct.
Matt
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: Steve Coe
- References:
- [sac-forum] STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: AJ Crayon
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- » [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: AJ Crayon
- [sac-forum] Re: STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] STF105 in Leo Minor?
- From: AJ Crayon