[sac-forum] Re: SAC Insurance

I agree, and since the insurance is our first line of defense in any
lawsuit, why are we doing this again, to protect them, or us.

Tom Hilton 

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Peter Argenziano
Sent: 09/13/2005 9:33 AM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: SAC Insurance

Tom,

My guess is that the insurance company would do neither (lower premiums or
increase coverage). If anything increased it would most likely be their
profit margin on underwriting our policy.  ;-)

Peter 

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stars
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:28 AM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: SAC Insurance

Is that not what the board is trying to do, "minimizing risk (and thereby
decreasing the likelihood of paying a claim.)"  If wavers are put into
place, would the insurance company reduce the cost to the club, or increase
the coverage, since we would be lowering there risk also?

Tom Hilton

Other related posts: