[sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List

I've been sitting at 3/4 complete for a while. With all the attention on the 
subject, I guess I could get with it and finish up as well. 

Jimmy Ray
---- Jack Jones <Telescoper@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
> I wish you the best of luck. You are so close. I didn't realize anyone was 
> that close to getting the award. 
> 
> Jack Jones
> Phoenix AZ
> Telescoper@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: David Hofland 
> To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 1:10 PM
> Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List
> 
> 
> Oh not a problem, I was just curious. Hopefully I'll be sending my checklist 
> in in about two weeks if the weather cooperates.  I was out one morning this 
> past cycle just before new moon, would have gotten about an 18 hour waning 
> cresent but for clouds on the eastern horizon as the sun rose.  I sat there 
> by our local airport in the car with my wife as the twilight brightened 
> hoping those clouds would move, the entire rest of the sky was clear. That 
> was the only clear shot at any 72 hour +/- new moon for the cycle.  But I 
> have all the other naked eye, binocular, telescope features so if the skies 
> are clear in early June I'll get it in. 
> 
> David Hofland
> Director, Student Services
> College of Nursing and Health Sciences
> Jacksonville State University
> 256.782.5276
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Jack Jones 
>   To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>   Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:39 PM
>   Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List
> 
> 
>   You're right, wrong list, my mistake. I was thinking of the 10 optional 
> activities on the Astronomical League Lunar list. Sorry.
> 
>   Jack Jones
>   Phoenix AZ
>   Telescoper@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: David Hofland 
>   To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>   Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:18 AM
>   Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List
> 
> 
>   I'm only lacking the before and after "within 48 hours" cresents, and "Old 
> Moon in the New Moon's Arms" for the SAC 110 Best Lunar Award. (Its been 
> cloudy during the necessary periods for these for about 3 months now here in 
> Alabama) So not that it would matter to my completion as I'll submit all 110 
> features anyway but I'm curious about the "10 objects of the SAC list are 
> optional . . ." I checked the information about completing this award that is 
> posted on the website and I didn't see anything about 10 observations being 
> optional.  
> 
>   David Hofland
>   Director, Student Services
>   College of Nursing and Health Sciences
>   Jacksonville State University
>   256.782.5276
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: Jack Jones 
>     To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>     Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:09 AM
>     Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List
> 
> 
>     And get your award along the way. Since 10 of the 110 of the SAC list are 
> optional I wonder if that would cover the differences between the two lists? 
> (Or by how many ours would be short of the Wood list... Could you check that 
> as you go along? Thx!
> 
>     Jack Jones
>     Phoenix AZ
>     Telescoper@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: Steve Coe 
>     To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>     Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 9:39 PM
>     Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List
> 
> 
>     Peter;
> 
> 
> 
>     What I am looking to do is add my notes into the document.  So, I guess 
> the "Word" look alike will do great.  I can just paste in my notes and then 
> check off what I have done.  I will use a combination of the SAC lunar list 
> and the Wood's 100 so that I can shoot some images of all that fun stuff over 
> the next several years.
> 
> 
> 
>     Plenty to do, thanks for your time and effort;
> 
>     Steve Coe
> 
> 
> 
>     P.S.  How did you attach a form to a "Sac-forum" email?  I thought that 
> freelists did not allow that?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Argenziano
>     Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:39 PM
>     To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Lunar 100 List
> 
> 
> 
>     Here is the log.
> 
>     Peter
> 
>     Steve Coe wrote: 
> 
> Rick; I really don't like PDF's because I cannot add my own 
> observationselectronically.  Is there a Word document of text document you 
> found thatwill allow me to change it to add what I want? Thanks;Steve Coe

Other related posts: